Control: tags -1 wontfix

On Fri, 15 May 2020 10:21:17 +0200 Matthijs Kooijman <matth...@stdin.nl>
wrote:
> Hey Niels,
> 
> > As far as I can tell, the underlying desire is to do some form of
> > deduplication.
> Yes, indeed.
> 
> > If so, then I think this is similar to #888397 with an expanded scope
> > and a proposal for doing this via dh_link (rather than dh_installdocs
> > or a new helper).
> 
> I guess my proposal is actually more narrow and specific. That other
> report asks about more generic deduplication (run on the entire package,
> or maybe a subset of files) that automatically finds duplicate files. I
> guess that could be useful, but is also quickly a lot more complicated
> (more work to find duplicates, which is the canonical one, any
> exceptions). I'm also less inclined to completely automate this, I'd
> rather make some more explicit choices (though something like "link files
> in *this* directory to *that* directory if you find duplicates" could be
> a nice compromise between automatic and manual work, maybe).
> 
> Regardless, my suggestion would allow manual and explicit deduplication
> to become a bit easier, at the expense of having to manually track the
> list of duplicate files on upstream changes (but with my suggestions,
> detecting files that are no longer duplicated is automatic, and lintian
> can I think already detect *new* duplicate files, so together that would
> allow adequately fixing all duplicates).
> 
> I think that both issues are thus sufficiently separate (in how they
> work and would be implemented) and can be valuable to eventually
> implement side-by-side, so I would suggest keeping both issues open for
> now.
> 
> Gr.
> 
> Matthijs


Thanks for the suggestion.

I have decided to tag this wontfix. If there is interest in this
feature, please consider prototyping it outside of debhelper (e.g. via a
dh sequence add-on).  Should it become successful, I will reconsider the
wontfix tag.

Thanks
~Niels

Reply via email to