control: tags -1 -moreinfo

Dear Paul,

Thanks for your checking!

On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 5:50 PM Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote:
>
> Control: tags -1 moreinfo
>
> Hi,
>
> On 17-05-2021 02:12, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > Please unblock package broadcom-sta
> >
> > [ Reason ]
> > Fix the unusable broadcom-sta-source package.
> >
> > [ Impact ]
> > It is not possible to build a package using module-assistant and the
> > version of broadcom-sta-source in bullseye.  However, dkms and
> > broadcom-sta-dkms can be used as an alternative.
> >
> > [ Tests ]
> > Only the build processes are being changed.  I tested that:
> > - broadcom-sta can be built from source
> > - module-assistant can build a module package from broadcom-sta-source
> >   for the current kernel version in bullseye (5.10.0-6-amd64)
> > - the resulting binary module package looks like a module package
> >   built from broadcom-sta-source in buster, modulo version changes
>
> * I wonder, broadcom-sta has seen quite some uploads the last couple of
> years and debhelper is even in oldstable newer than the version
> mentioned. How were all these uploads possible?

I think "some uploads" means uploading "src:broadcom-sta", which
states debhelper version in debian/control.
And debian/control is not updated in this unblock request.

The source updated in this upload is: debian/control.modules.in
which is not used for upload, and will be explained below.

> * What is/was the behavior of debhelper if the compat level was not
> specified? In the freeze we don't want debhelper compat bumps unless the
> package is proven to have no delta regardless of the old-vs-new level.

The issue resolved in this upload is: after installing
broadcom-sta-source, when user try to build their own deb files by
using tool module-assistant, the deb build would fail.

The user built deb is not for upload to debian archive, but for
private use only.
Personally I don't install and use broadcom-sta-source, so I didn't
notice this issue for years.

I hope things get clear now. Thank you!

Cheers,
-- 
Roger Shimizu, GMT +9 Tokyo
PGP/GPG: 4096R/6C6ACD6417B3ACB1

Reply via email to