On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 12:33:43 -0300 Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> wrote: > On Sat, Dec 25, 2021 at 02:25:06PM +0000, Evgeni Golov wrote: > > On December 25, 2021 12:35:45 PM UTC, Antonio Terceiro <terce...@debian.org> wrote: > > >They probably would need to be provided by a (NEW) lxc-common package. > > >If we ever need to transition to liblxc2, we don't want both liblxc* > > >packages providing those files. > > > > On Ubuntu, this package us called liblxc-common, which we probably > > should also use, to make life of other consumers easier? > > Sure! I didn't check there first.
I think a liblxc-common package should work just fine. I haven't found any other files in the lxc package that LXD is expecting to have around, but if I do I'll update this bug. I'm happy to help test any changes to the packaging when they're ready. Thanks! Mathias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
