Hi all,

On 21-12-26 23:08:01, Georg Faerber wrote:
> Besides, functional testing of this new package still needs to happen.

I've built a package now to ease this, and uploaded it to [1]. This file
is not signed, but this email is. The sha256sum of said file should be
1edd0e09abf870146da441e7737fe78f634351c9cbbd0abdb46962911fe38e03.

I guess it would make sense if interested parties would test this
package, before reaching out to the SRMs.

Cheers,
Georg


[1] 
https://people.debian.org/~georg/rsyslog/rsyslog_8.2102.0-2+deb10u1_amd64.deb

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to