Hi Ian,

Thanks for cleaning up this mess, and apologies for creating it in the
first place... I agree the tooling could & should be better here, but
I still should have caught this while I did the upload.

The changes look good to me.

Jelmer

On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 12:09:29AM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Hi.  I have just pushed a version of xdelta which resolves the changes
> made in 1.1.3-9.4 with those made in 1.1.3-10.1 (which was mistakenly
> based on 1.1.3-9, omitting the intervening NMU changes).
> 
> The resulting package now has the libraries in the multiarch paths.  I
> think all is probably well, but the package doesn't have
> autopkgtests.  Typing "xdelta" with the .debs installed works so I
> think it's fine ?  I hope some other package's autopkgtests will
> detect it if not.
> 
> Here is the numduff.  It is against 1.1.3-9.4.  I think this should be
> regarded as the nmudiff for both #965890 and #1002851.  Diffs
> involving 1.1.3-10.1 are unreasonably cluttered by autogenerated file
> changes.
> 
> I hope this meets with everyone's approval.
> Happy new year!
> 
> Ian.
> 


> 
> 
> -- 
> Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk>   These opinions are my own.  
> 
> Pronouns: they/he.  If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk,
> that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.


-- 
Jelmer Vernooij <jel...@jelmer.uk>
PGP Key: https://www.jelmer.uk/D729A457.asc

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to