On 13 January 2022 at 02:29, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | On 11/01/2022 17.54, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > On 11 January 2022 at 17:31, Andreas Beckmann wrote: | > | Package: gsl-doc | > | Version: 2.6-2 | > | Severity: serious | > | > Why would that be a serious bug rather normal or even minor? | | Feel free to downgrade, but try to have the versions in sync for the | bookworm release.
I have a moment now so I'll probably just do it. | > It's a bit of a manual process becuase of the dfsg dance and manual ops. And | > there generally is not that much that changes between versions -- GSL is | > fairly mature and stable at this point. | | because of such manual processes the separate src:*-doc sometimes look | like bitrot (e.g. scalapack 2.1 vs scalapack-doc 1.5) ... Yes. And I starting to think that it may almost be better to withdraw the -doc package then. When we started to package (esp html-based) documentation back in the day (say 20 years ago) connectivity was way worse. Today most people reach for the browser first. I would suspect popcon number support this. Anyway, thanks for the nag :) Dirk -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
