Hello Paul, On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 19:58, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote: > On 21-09-2022 20:50, Samuel Henrique wrote: > > Please let me know if there is anything besides aircrack-ng blocked by > > this, as it increases the priority of fixing this. > > Well, I pinged you because I noticed the bug wasn't forwarded to you. I > looked because aircrack-ng showed up in my out-of-sync script, that I > use to file RC bugs for packages being out-of-sync between unstable and > testing. The reason why I didn't file the bug is because you already > took action to file the RM bug. An RC bug will cause autoremoval in due > time.
Got it, I don't wanna cause you more work, but feel free to go ahead with the RC bug, that can serve as a deadline for me to solve the issue. > > [0] Since most of the reverse deps will also have to be removed, I > > think the only one which stays is forensics-all. > > For architecture specific problems we have porters. Have you considered > contacting them? I haven't considered that, no, I'll reach out to them, thanks for the suggestion. Regards, -- Samuel Henrique <samueloph>
