Hello Sven,
sorry for my slow answer.

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 10:14:24PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
> Am 13.01.2023 um 21:50 schrieb Helge Kreutzmann:
> > As you can see, "linuxinfo_4.1.2.orig.tar.xz.asc" is contained in the
> > .dsc file, but not in the .changes file.
> 
> This is the opposite of what you wrote in the original report (where the
> .asc file was in the changes file and not in the .dsc), and is in fact
> normal as you did not include the upstream sources (the default if
> debian/changelog indicates that this is not the first debian revision).

This was a mistake of mine, I probably failed to write it correctly. I
apologize.

> > When I uploaded this (with -2) the archive rejected this.
> 
> Yes, because your .dsc file referenced the .asc file, but the changes
> file did not include it, nor was the file already in the archive.
> 
> > I manually edited the .changes to add
> > "linuxinfo_4.1.2.orig.tar.xz.asc", and this worked.
> 
> I guess could also have passed "-sa" to dpkg-buildpackage to include the
> full sources again, but whatever worked for you.

So I understand, if I had included the full sources, then the .asc file
would have been included as well? And does this work? - I remember that
in the past I was told that the sources are already in the archive,
and hence cannot be uploaded again (but I might be wrong on this).

Then this two things should be documented:

1. .asc files are always (automatically) included if the upstream
   sources are included (either by default or by -sa)

2. .asc files cannot be included on their own, but rather require the
   corresponding upstream sources (which would make sense, indeed).
   [1]

Greetings

         Helge

  [1] If I'm right that the upstream source can only be uploaded once,
  then possibly a sentence that .asc files should only be included at
  Debian revision 1.
-- 
      Dr. Helge Kreutzmann                     deb...@helgefjell.de
           Dipl.-Phys.                   http://www.helgefjell.de/debian.php
        64bit GNU powered                     gpg signed mail preferred
           Help keep free software "libre": http://www.ffii.de/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to