Bastian Blank wrote: > Package: rovclock > Version: 0.6e-2 > Severity: important > > There was an error while trying to autobuild your package: > > >>Automatic build of rovclock_0.6e-2 on debian-31 by sbuild/s390 85 > > [...] > >>/usr/bin/make >>make[1]: Entering directory `/build/buildd/rovclock-0.6e' >>gcc -O2 -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -o rovclock rovclock.c >>rovclock.c:27:20: error: sys/io.h: No such file or directory >>rovclock.c: In function 'pci_read': >>rovclock.c:125: warning: implicit declaration of function 'outl' >>rovclock.c:128: warning: implicit declaration of function 'inl' >>rovclock.c: In function 'pll_read': >>rovclock.c:153: warning: implicit declaration of function 'outb' >>rovclock.c: In function 'find_card': >>rovclock.c:303: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of >>data type >>rovclock.c: In function 'main': >>rovclock.c:426: warning: implicit declaration of function 'iopl' >>make[1]: *** [rovclock] Error 1 >>make[1]: Leaving directory `/build/buildd/rovclock-0.6e' >>make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2 >>****************************************************************************** >>Build finished at 20060510-1635 >>FAILED [dpkg-buildpackage died]
Erhhh... Did I understand right, that you're compiling rovclock for arch "s390" (what's that? ohh IBM S/390.. ) If so, I'm not sure that this package will be usefull on non-pc (and may be non-ppc, not sure) arch, because it's for ATI radeon video-adapters. If I undestand right, which is the right way to say that package should not be built for some arch (or for i386 only)? -- Regards, Alexander. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
