On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 10:12:22PM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 01:29:28PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 10:50:34AM +0200, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > > > My take would be to mark it as unsupported after the trixie development > > > cycle > > > has started (this flags awareness, but has no impact on stable releases) > > > and then revisit the support situation before the trixie freeze (Kea > > > might be > > > a full replacment by then or maybe it turns out the patch support is > > > ensured > > > despite upstream's EOL) > > > > > Hi Moritz, > > > > Now that bookworm is out and (AFAICT) that the trixie development cycle > > has started, are able to go ahead with marking isc-dhcp as unsupported? > > Ultimately it's the maintainer(s) call, but sounds good to me. > Are you referring to the maintainer of debian-security-support, or the maintainer of isc-dhcp?
Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez
