On Thu, Jul 06, 2023 at 09:13:46PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > I'm not sure so please explain in more detail.  dh-r was designed to put
> > the lowest restriction regarding the versions.  I remember some
> > discussion some time ago that Dirk thought we should put stronger
> > restrictions (and he is sometimes adding version restrictions manually
> > that are not helpful for backporting).  If I will be sure I understand
> > your point exactly I can check the code and the relevant discussion.
> > (Feel free to file a bug report about this and we can discuss it there
> > if you think this makes more sense.)
> 
> It comes from this line:
> https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/dh-r/-/blob/master/dh/R.pm#L272
> 
> More precisely the “r-base-core (>= $rbase_version)” part, which
> imposes an unnecessarily tight restriction on the r-base-core version.

Andreas, if you remember, the code pointed out by Sébastien is
the exact same reason we had to t-p-u r-cran-shiny during freeze, See

        https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035428#15
        https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1035428#40
        
https://tracker.debian.org/news/1431956/accepted-r-cran-shiny-174dfsg-2deb12u1-source-into-testing-proposed-updates/

Best,
Nilesh

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to