Il 23/07/2023 14:50, Felix Zielcke ha scritto:
(Adding Fabio)Am Sonntag, dem 23.07.2023 um 13:42 +0100 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire:Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi, On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 05:38:07PM +0100, Felix Zielcke wrote:memtest86+ 5.01-3.1 in stable is very old and doestn't run correctly on recent hardware.In the meantime I see there has been a backport of 6 to bullseye- backports. Is it still the best course of action to remove 5.01-3.1 from stable, or does it work well enough on old hardware to be worth keeping? Thanks,Hi, actually now I think we could just keep it in bullseye. Anyone with recent hardware could get it from backports and probable also will (if not have already) upgrade to bookworm. Or what do you think Fabio? Should the old memtest still be removed from oldstable? I at least didn't get any complains about the old version, since I became a co-maintainer of memtest86+
Hi, old version doesn't work on many hardwares but deleting memtest86+ from oldstable repo doesn't seem like a good thing to me, rather now that there is a new stable I suppose oldstable is much less used and relevant and could stay that way; because I suppose that almost all sysadmin/users now have the new iso and in case they need to test the old systems without being able to load the iso, they install the new memtest86+ version from backports before. or am I wrong?
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
