On 2023-07-28 11:14 +0200, Diederik de Haas wrote: > On Sat, 22 Jul 2023 08:36:26 +0200 Sven Joachim <svenj...@gmx.de> wrote: >> Package: foot-terminfo >> >> Two years ago the foot and foot-direct terminfo entries were added to >> ncurses upstream, and I would like to include them in the ncurses-term >> package, replacing the ones shipped currently in the foot-terminfo >> package. > > Sorry if this is a dumb question, but will it (automatically) still get the > latest foot terminfo 'data'? > > https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/commits/branch/master/foot.info indicates there > were changes to that file (even) a month ago and foot is at version 1.15.1 > > https://invisible-island.net/ncurses/terminfo.ti.html#toc-_Foot OTOH mentions > Version 1.8.2
> I couldn't find an official git repo, but on > https://github.com/mirror/ncurses/ > I only found 2 commits wrt foot and the latest was from 2021-11-14. That mirror is several months out of date, the official on can be found at https://github.com/ThomasDickey/ncurses-snapshots. There have been two foot related commits this year, both following bug reports by the foot developer: ,---- | 20230610 | + add xterm+focus to foot+base (patch by Daniel Ekloef). | | 20230401 | + remove DECCOLM+DECSCLM from foot (patch by Daniel Ekloef). `---- In addition the following change also changes the foot entry: ,---- | 20221224 | + add/use bracketed+paste to help identify terminals supporting this `---- If you look at the recent commits to foot's terminfo file, you can see that they either follow or precede corresponding changes in ncurses: https://codeberg.org/dnkl/foot/commits/branch/master/foot.info > So that gives me* the impression that we'd get outdated terminfo for foot with > the take over? I hope I'm wrong, but figured I'd ask. My impression at the moment is different, otherwise I would not have filed this bug in the first place. Cheers, Sven
