>>>>> "Ansgar" == Ansgar  <ans...@43-1.org> writes:
    Ansgar> And the more important question: how often do we want to
    Ansgar> rehash the usrmerge discussion?  At some point we should
    Ansgar> stick with a decision and not endlessly restart discussions
    Ansgar> (unless something really significant changes, but I don't
    Ansgar> think this is the case).  *mumble* leadership something
    Ansgar> *mumble*

For myself, I think the issues raised in DEP17 are significant enough
that I would at least read a proposal to explain a different way to get
to a merged /usr system.
I.E. yes, I believe that something has changed significantly enough that
I would be willing to read proposals for alternate ways to get to the
end goal we've agreed to.

However:

1) Jackson is not making such a proposal.  As it turns out, he has
proposed a different end goal, and has not (in my mind) met the
extraordinary burden of explaining why we should change goals.  He did
not even address our current goal and the divergence from that goal.

2) While I would be willing to read such proposals, I am not interested
in pausing current efforts unless something really unexpected comes up
in such a proposal.


Part of building a community is listening to people and engaging with
them even when you do not expect to be convinced.  I do think there are
limits to that.  Prior to the discussions that led to DEP-17, I think a
message like Jackson's would have been out of bounds.  I am disappointed
that Jackson did not more clearly articulate that his end state was
different than the one we agreed to: for me, that complicates things.
If you argue that his message should be out of bounds because he wasn't
even trying to get us to the place we had agreed we wanted to reach, I
will not object.

But I think coming forward and asking what level of proof would be
required for an alternate approach that involved unwinding current
progress but ultimately got us to merged /usr would be something in good
faith at this point.
Other than having an entirely different goal in mind, that is what
Jackson did.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to