On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:42:09 +0300 Michael Tokarev <m...@tls.msk.ru> wrote: > Control: tag -1 + help > > On Sun, 25 Jun 2023 23:20:24 +0100 bl...@debian.org wrote: > > Package: busybox > > Severity: important > > User: bl...@debian.org > > Usertags: missing-systemd-service > > > > Dear Maintainer(s), > > > > busybox has been flagged by Lintian as shipping a sysv-init script > > without a corresponding systemd unit file. The default init system in > > Debian is systemd, and so far this worked because a transitional > > sysv-init-to-unit generator was shipped by systemd. This is in the > > process of being deprecated and will be removed by the time Trixie > > ships, so the remaining packages that ship init scripts without > > systemd units will stop working. > > > > There are various advantages to using native units, for example the > > legacy generator cannot tell the different between a oneshot service > > and a long running daemon. Also, sanboxing and security features > > become available for services. For more information, consult the > > systemd documentation: > > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd.unit.html > > > > You can find the Lintian warning here: > > > > https://lintian.debian.org/sources/busybox > > This site can't be found. But it's ok.
Yeah things around Lintian publishing have changed since these bugs have been filed > So in current state, only udhcpd lacks systemd file. So I tried to > provide one. The initscript for udhcpd checks for UDHCPD_ENABLED=yes/no > in /etc/default/udhcpd and does nothing if it is not enabled, which > is the default. Since there's no way in systemd to check for that > (well, there is, with ExecConditional, but it ugly at best), I thought > to ship udhcpd.service not enabled by default. Except it doesn't > work. > > With just dh_installsystemd --no-enable, it is still started. > With dh_installsystemd --no-enable --no-start, it is started > as well, - apparently because initscript is started. Also, > with --no-enable --no-start, it is not restarted on upgrades > if enabled locally. > > After doing several iterations, I decided to abandon this attempt, - > it just does not work, and I've no time to fight with the tools. > > If someone has a working recipe for all this madness, please > share a patch for d/rules. > > Tagging with "help" for now. Could you please share a branch or a patch with your attempt? What you tried should work, but it's hard to say without looking at the implementation in details. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
