Hi Graham, Am Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 01:37:02PM -0100 schrieb Graham Inggs: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 at 07:21, Andreas Tille <andr...@an3as.eu> wrote: > > I have no idea how to work around this. > > I found a workaround; demote pandoc from a Depends to a Recommends in > the r-cran-rmarkdown package. It seems that pandoc is not used for > building, at least for r-bioc-biovizbase, -degnorm, -ioniser, scrnaseq > and -tximeta, which I tried.
Thanks for the patch - applied and uploaded. > Do you know why r-bioc-metagenomeseq is considered neither good nor > bad in the tracker? Argh, upstream has messed up DESCRIPTION/git_branch which we trust to detect r-bioc-api. This is fixed[1] and uploaded. I'll take this occurence as a reason to fail with an error in dh-r to avoid such cases in future. > Also, why do r-bioc-netsam and r-bioc-org.hs.eg.db not even appear on > the tracker? I was always wondering about this but I have no clue. r-bioc-go.db is the third example in this row. I was updating these in past transitions manually which is IMHO no big harm - but I simply don't understand. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/r-bioc-metagenomeseq/-/blob/master/debian/patches/fix_git_branch.patch -- http://fam-tille.de