Of course, since anfo FTBFS due to bug #1012893, we can't actually
transition the binary package names right now (because we'd have to be able
to build a binary package).

However, libanfo0 also has no reverse-dependencies in the archive outside of
anfo itself, so there is no urgency for handling this transition; it just
needs to be addressed with the next upload of anfo to the archive.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                   https://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com                                     vor...@debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to