X-Debbugs-CC: Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 01:55:51PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: > > I presume the need for "close together in time" is to prevent > > interoperability issues from cropping up in unstable between shared > > library versions on different sides of the time_t transition. How > > timely would our staged versions need to be uploaded to unstable to > > obviate the need for the NMUs? I ask because it is very difficult to > > say with a useful degree of certainty when these staged versions will > > actually reach testing. Experience has shown that linphone stack > > transitions are prone to being afflicted by (sometimes multi-month) > > delays due to being blocked by other transitions, and I see no open > > bugreport for linphone on the release.debian.org pseudopackage, so > > Berni (who will do these uploads) apparently has not yet applied for a > > new transition slot. > > Based on the above I think you should let us go ahead with the NMUs to > unstable and not worry about it, clobbering them later at your convenience.
I agree. Regards.
