On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 09:13:32AM +0000, Alberto Garcia wrote: > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 09:23:38AM +0000, Steve Langasek wrote: > > Please find attached a final version of this patch for the time_t > > transition. This patch is being uploaded to unstable.
> Thanks for the patch! > I have a question: soon I'll need to start transitioning the WPE > packages to a new API (we were blocked by the reverse dependencies) > which means libwpewebkit-1.1-0 -> libwpewebkit-2.0-0 > Shall I add the 't64' suffix to the new binaries for clarity or is it > unnecessary? In principle they won't have a version without 64-bit > time_t (unless there's a backport which I'm not planning to do). Please drop the t64 when bumping the soname, but keep the dpkg-dev versioned build-dep. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developer https://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
