On Tuesday, 5 March 2024 19:28:25 CET Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Philip Hands <p...@hands.com> (2024-03-05): > > Cool, in that case I'll fix those two things and then use the result > > for the MR[1], and if the openQA test runs look OK, will merge that. > > Only skimmed over it, but that looks sensible, thanks all. > > Is it worth getting d-l-english involved in a final review before > getting that translated? Contrary to a lot of not-so-critical l10n > material, that particular screen is crucial, and I'd hate it if we > wasted translator efforts due to a missed typo or obvious improvement.
I had started a reply before I had to get out the door, so I'll just keep it to one suggestion, which may seem a bit 'radical': How about getting rid of the password advise entirely from the d-i screen? We could still make educational resources with f.e. tips on passwords/ passphrases in f.e. the wiki, but it's not the job or the (best) place to put such things in the d-i screens?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
