On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 23:12:57 +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > Reviews welcome; I'm not sure it's the most elegant and safe solution, > > and also if this libperl5.38t64 naming has other effects. > Thanks for fixing this.
Thanks for checking. > Didn't dig deeply into what the test is actually doing, but I think it'd > be fine to just hardcode libperl5.38t64 FWIW. After some thinking, I think I makes to (temporarily) allow both libperl5.XXt64 and libperl5.XX, otherwise we'll have a mess during the 5.40 transition. (After that we can get rid of the option with the suffix again.) > But whatever works is good of course. :) Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at -- Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member VIBE!AT & SPI Inc. -- Supporter Free Software Foundation Europe `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature
