severity 385115 important thanks On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 10:47:40AM +0200, Roberto Gordo Saez wrote:
> There are no information on where data files came from. Looking at the > web page, upstream claims that music loops and raw sound effects were > taken from http://www.partnersinrhyme.com/ and > http://www.findsounds.com/. It is very likely for most of them to be > non-free, or even undistributable, as stated here: > http://www.findsounds.com/cpolicy.html > Origin from all other data files (sound, music, graphics...) should be > clarified, since they can be in the same situation. Upstream authors > should include information stating whether data is made from scratch or > based on other sources. > It is always a good idea to add some information on origin of artwork > and tools used. When data is based on other free sources, credits and a > pointer to the proper license should be given. When data is based on > non-free (or unlicensed) sources, obviously can't be distributed by > Debian and need to be replaced. And when data is created from scratch, a > short notice is appreciated to make it clear. The copyright file claims that these files "come from" http://www.reptilelabour.com/software/chromium/ and are available under the terms of the Artistic License. If you determine that *specific* files are covered by a different copyright than the one claimed in debian/copyright, or under a license other than the Artistic License, please re-raise the severity. Otherwise, simple second-guessing of the statements in the copyright file doesn't seem to be a reason for a release-critical bug. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
