On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 08:51:02AM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:58:09PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > Andrea, I just knew you had it coming when you labeled something as
> > DFSG-free when it was in no way related to the DFSG ...
> > 
> > On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 09:39:33PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> > > 
> > > I think this line is self-explanatory:
> > > 
> > > ifeq ($(DFSG),)
> > > DEB_BUILD_CONFIGURE += --disable-mpdvdkit --enable-dvdread 
> > > --disable-mencoder
> > > endif
> > > 
> > > :-)
> > 
> > This line is in no way self-explanatory.  Labeling the condition as DFSG
> > is unfortunate and very very misleading.  Both MEncoder and libdvdcss
> > are perfectly free-in-every-sense-of-the-word GPLed programs.
> > 
> > libdvdcss is not in Debian because of the FUD surrounding DVD decryption
> > software, MEncoder is not in Debian because some people get queasy about
> > encoding software.  None of this, however, is related to the DFSG in any
> > way, much less does it go contrary to the DFSG.
> 
> Has this been discussed on debian-legal ?  (Adding mencoder, not adding
> mplayer. I *know* everything about adding mplayer was discussed at its
> time)

No, it hasn't.  Should it be discussed?

Removing MEncoder, at least for the moment, was a compromise with the
ftpmasters.  It made their review of the MPlayer package and thus the
decision whether to accept it or not considerably easier.

Diego


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to