I can't see how this can be deemed "important" - perhaps the automated
tool should be less paranoid. I built, tested and run gpe-timesheet ON
amd64 and have done for the entire time it was waiting in NEW.

There is no way that the automated message can claim that this "problem" :
"will cause
your package to segfault on architectures where the size of a pointer
is greater than the size of an integer, such as ia64 and amd64."

That simply is not true.

It's a minor problem and a minor bug. If a real user can demonstrate a
problem then that would be different but this automated tool is out of
line.

--


Neil Williams
=============
http://www.data-freedom.org/
http://www.nosoftwarepatents.com/
http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/

Attachment: pgpwzZUwecLY1.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to