On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 12:56:54AM -0600, Luis Rodrigo Gallardo Cruz wrote: > Package: flashplugin-nonfree > Version: 9.0.48.0.3 > Severity: wishlist > > My system has links to the plugin files for > > /usr/lib/firefox/plugins/flashplayer.xpt -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/flashplayer.xpt > /usr/lib/firefox/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so > /usr/lib/iceape/plugins/flashplayer.xpt -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/flashplayer.xpt > /usr/lib/iceape/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so > /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins/flashplayer.xpt -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/flashplayer.xpt > /usr/lib/iceweasel/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so > /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins/flashplayer.xpt -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/flashplayer.xpt > /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so > /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/flashplayer.xpt -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/flashplayer.xpt > /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so -> > ../../flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so > > > Is there some reason xulrunner is not in that list? Liferea picks up > its (default) rendering engine implementation from /usr/lib/xulrunner, > thus this default configuration means there's no flash support in > feeds. > > I'm CC:ing xulrunner's maintainer in case he knows a reason.
There is somewhat a reason : we need a central directory where all plugins would be installed, and every application supporting NPAPI plugins would pick in this directory. Where this should be has not been decided. I wonder if /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins shouldn't be enough, though it's kind of unfair for konqueror and others. Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
