On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems to me that the best course of action is to see this issue as an > erratum for 2.6.22 and check whether it's fixed as soon as we switch the > installer to 2.6.24 (ASAP after the beta). > If it is still reproducible with 2.65.24, it should be reported upstream.
I fully agree. Don't let this bug delay the oh-so-overdue release of d-i beta1. After all, the final installer will be completely different, because every minor kernel version in 2.6.x line is like a brand new product. Frank -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
