On dom, 2008-04-20 at 15:23 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote: > > So you can repackage the upstream tarball and remove those jarfiles and > > make it DFSG-Free. > > I'm not sure this is really necessary, the problem is not that the > jars are not free but that they are used by the build system. All we > would gain is a decrease in size of the .orig.tar.gz.
Yes, you're right, it's not necessary. But just in case you decide to remove the lib/ dir, you already have the solution to the jarbundle target issue. > > * 06proposed_upstream_fix_ruleNestingLevel: Upstream still uses antlr3 > > beta, the debian version is the stable one, this patch allows using the > > debian version. I've not tested extensively, but it works for me :). > > Integrated as 05_antlr.dpatch; that was my "old" name but your patch > is much better than my first attempt! > > I've reorganized my svn repository a bit, so that 2.3 is in trunk > again, and the new 2.4-beta is in branches/2.4: > http://svn.toastfreeware.priv.at/debian/jabref/trunk > http://svn.toastfreeware.priv.at/debian/jabref/branches/2.4 Great! :) I'd like to see the package in main, looks like the only problem left now is with libpdfbox-java in contrib. Thanks for your good work! > > > Thanks again for your help! > > Cheers, > gregor -- Gerardo Curiel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Geek By NaTure,LiNuX By ChOiCe,DebiAn of CoUrsE gpg fingerprint: 228B 0F96 8653 DF52 9740 B75E FB32 9C30 E179 7BD2 http://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje está firmada digitalmente
