martin f krafft wrote: > Yes and no. Normal tags are in refs/tags. I am proposing the > refs/top-tags namespace, which is reserved for topgit anyway (topgit > reserved refs/top-*).
Sorry, I didn't pay attention to this. I guess this needs a special cloning/pushing/pulling procedure, then? BTW, you don't talk about pushing/pulling/sharing with others in your quick tuto (but you do talk about cloning). > You want to keep files with SHA-1 refs in a branch? I am not sure > I like that at all. [...] Yes. > [...] First of all, this clearly seems like a feature > for upstream, [...] What do you mean by "a feature for upstream"? > [...] and second, Git is all about keeping track of refs, > storing them as payload in a branch seems like patching patch files > :) Indeed, it seems so. But I was getting inspiration from pristine-tar. I guess *.id files that are committed there are not meant to be used (and/or alterable) by human beings. Do we want this for "historical" bases and tips of tg branches? I am not really at ease with mixing "live" and "dead" script-manipulated references in the same place. Anyway, as long as my tag namespace is not polluted, I guess I could bear it. -- Stéphane
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
