Hi, When replying please don't forget to CC the bug report.
2008/10/6 Paolo Cavallini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Raphael Geissert ha scritto: > >> http://alioth.debian.org/~atomo64-guest/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn574-1_i386.deb > > no cursor > >> http://alioth.debian.org/~atomo64-guest/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn572-1_i386.deb > > no cursor > >> http://alioth.debian.org/~atomo64-guest/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-2_i386.deb > > no cursor The main difference with 570-1 is that -2 was, mistakenly, built against the version of libdrm2 in experimental. Since you were able to install -2 and all the other .debs which depend on experimental's libdrm2, could you please tell me what other packages you installed from experimental? > >>> I don't see anything in the rev 570-577 range that could explain the HW >>> cursor problem at first glance. Possibly, the user can add Option >>> "SWCursor" to his xorg conf to workaround the problem, but a real fix would >>> obviously be better. > > I tried this once, when I first saw the problem, but it didin't work. I > did not check again now. >> >> And, as suggested by upstream; could you please also try this one: >> >> http://alioth.debian.org/~atomo64-guest/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn596-1_i386.deb > > funny big square cursor, with changing patterns inside. unusual, better > than nothing, but I still suspect users would not appreciate this :) Bah, too good to be true. > >> It is the latest code by upstream, contains the code from the randr branch >> and "It contains new hardware cursor code which might help with this problem" >> (said by upstream). >> >> And if the above one didn't work, could you please try this one too? >> >> http://alioth.debian.org/~atomo64-guest/xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn596+suggestedchange-1_i386.deb > > no cursor Oh crap, I in my box don't get mouse cursor in 596 without the change that I applied to 596+suggestedchange. > > With xserver-xorg-video-openchrome_0.2.902+svn570-1_i386.deb, all back > to normal. > All the best. It might be possible that I will have to rebuild all the packages with unstable's libdrm2 and ask you to test a couple of them, just in case (that's what happens when experimental is used); hope you don't mind. > > -- > Paolo Cavallini, see: * http://www.faunalia.it/pc * > Cheers, -- Raphael Geissert - Debian Maintainer www.debian.org - get.debian.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]