Hi, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > No idea why it does not result in a dependency on amd64/i386, but... > > On architectures other than i386/amd64 the build log says: > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libcrypto.so.0.9.8 could be avoided if > "debian/openoffice.org-core/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/libucpdav1.so" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols). > dpkg-shlibdeps: warning: dependency on libssl.so.0.9.8 could be avoided if > "debian/openoffice.org-core/usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.1/program/libucpdav1.so" > were not uselessly linked against it (they use none of its symbols).
Hmm. Interesting. > On i386/amd64 the build log says: > Making: ../../../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libucpdav1.so > i486-linux-gnu-g++ -Wl,-z,noexecstack -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs > -Wl,--as-needed ... Ah, that explains it... > I don't know why the -Wl,--as-needed is only passed on i386/amd64, > but it seems in no case OpenSSL is used directly by OOo. OOo has a compiler flag definition for every arch *separately*, and it seems Novell added -Wl,--as-needed - but only for i386/amd64.... ;-) Anyway, I'll fix this but I am not convinced that we should move from SSl to Gnutls (except for curl which must be at gnutls for now because of librdf0-dev. When it'll be removed with 3.2 I'll switch that to openssl, too) Grüße/Regards, René -- .''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer : :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/ `. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73 `- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
