close 557765 tags 557765 wontfix The debian packaging guide says you can do it both ways and there doesn't seem to be a consensus on the right way. I'm going to leave it as is.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:06:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote: > The -dev package should be named libfishsound-dev, without the 1, so that > reverse dependencies don't need to bump their build dependency whenever > the ABI changes. Cheers, John -- John Blog http://www.inodes.org LCA2010 http://www.lca2010.org.nz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
