Hi Uwe, On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 03:47:07PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > > Not necessarily, if I know the branch is for upstream consumption I can > > rework > > the history to be clean. > > > > Anyhow, and that's the whole point, I can't use git format-patch on a topgit > > branch unless I remember to manually exclude .topgit and .topdeps, otherwise > > upstream will get those as well. > > > > > I assume you don't mean with incremental that you only send the new > > > changes if you send an updated patch, do you? > > > > correct > > > > [omitting the rest, but thanks for the suggestion] > What do you think on this bug today? I consider it OK to close it as > "invalid" or somthing like that.
I tend to agree, yes, if one wants to use format-patch then it is easy to alias it to something and exclude .topgit and .topdeps, please go ahead thanks, filippo -- Filippo Giunchedi - http://esaurito.net - 0x6B79D401 I was once walking through the forest alone. A tree fell right in front of me -- and I didn't hear it. -- Steven Wright -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
