Hi,

On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:52 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote:
> The current plan is to EOL MPICH and LAM by removing all reverse
> dependencies on those packages. One big step in this direction would be
> via mpi-defaults. The current version depends on LAM/MPI for arches
> where Open MPI is not supported (yet). A package is prepared that will
> depend on MPICH2 on these arches. After uploading that, binNMUs are
> needed for the depending packages.

How is this transition progressing?  I note that there are still 10 open
bugs listed at [1].

>  [1] 
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=old-mpi-eol;users=debian-scie...@lists.debian.org

Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to