> Ah, it seems I misunderstood. I thought every solution would need poking and > you just chose wicd among the alternatives. If this line is only needed for > wicd users I'm perfectly fine with it.
To be perfectly fair, I'm sure only that wicd needs poking and wpa_supplicant on its own doesn't. But I'd be surprised if network manager, that seems the most widespread solution, didn't work and no one had complained. I think it is just a bug in wicd that is easly worked around. Cheers, Luca -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
