On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:15:00AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:06:01AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 10:00:09AM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > On 04/28/2011 09:57 AM, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > >Take the build log, remove all lines without -fPIC, you'll only get > > > >lines for building binaries and objects that aren't linked into > > > >libxul.so. QED. > > > > > > shows nothing at all, and in particular no reason for the reassignment. > > > > Another data point that I gave before: 3.5.17-1 built just fine, but > > 3.5.18-1 didn't. And attached here is the diff between both versions, > > since you don't trust the maintainer telling you that the switch in the > > toolchain is the likely culprit. > > > > But, yeah, it's just easier to dismiss toolchain bugs. > > I'll also add that the symbol for which the relocation is failing, > _restgpr_29_x, comes from gcc, in gcc/config/rs6000/crtresxgpr.asm. > But you're right, it's most probably not a toolchain problem.
Even better, if I download xulrunner-1.9.1_1.9.1.18-1_powerpc.deb and take a look at the relocations in libxul.so, I can't even find the relocation ld.so is complaining about. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
