On Sun, 07 Aug 2011, Daniel Baumann wrote: > i filled all the bugs to make lxc in and for squeeze working during last > autumn, but release team showed no interest in that which is why squeeze > (currently also neither wheezy nor sid) is not usable at all for lxc as > a host system nor as a container system (links to the respective bugs > can be found on my wiki page at > http://wiki.progress-linux.org/software/lxc/).
I think you're exagerating and you did not try very hard. Instead you took the easy way to fix it for you only. :( I saw that Julien Cristau was not very welcoming in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=607713 but you could have NMUed ifupdown anyway even if it was not severity serious. Once a fixed package exists in sid for a few weeks it's easier to request an unblock. And Julien is not the only person in the release team, you could have tried to work with someone else if he's not cooperative with you. > regarding stable, either these get all fixed at the same time, or lxc in > should rather remain as it is since the default lenny containers 'sort > of' works. changing it to squeeze will break it horribly. A compromise could be to provide a backport that works. I mailed the ifupdown maintainer to ask him to take care of fixing 607713 in sid and maybe in squeeze. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English) ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
