(please leave pkg-ace-devel@ in CC:) Hello,
Le 07/08/2011 17:31, Adam D. Barratt a écrit : > On Sun, 2011-08-07 at 12:54 +0200, Thomas Girard wrote: >> as per #630897 ace needs to be repackaged in stable only. >> >> Details available at [1]; just let me know if something is missing or >> unclear. > [...] >> [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630897#37 > > Sorry, this seems to have fallen off our radar at some point. As a > general comment, when you're providing pre-built packages for people to > check, it's generally helpful if the .dsc / .changes are signed, to > provide some sort of trust path for the download. Sorry about that. > Overall, the re-packaging looks okay; thanks. Checking the diff was > made slightly more annoying by the fact that the source package is > tarball-in-tarball and packaged in a way that debdiff's automatic > support for that format doesn't seem to like, but never mind. Yes. Packaging was overhauled in unstable to avoid that. > One quick question on the changes, however: > > -ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=high > +ace (5.7.7+dfsg-1) stable; urgency=low > [...] > +ace (5.7.7-4) unstable; urgency=low > > Why was the urgency on the -4 stanza changed? My mistake, good catch, thanks! (I guess I forgot to commit the urgency bump; hence the issue.) I'll make a new package and publish it again at the same location, signed this time. Regards, Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org