Hi, On Wednesday 07 December 2011 21:03:43 Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Why not trying to find the problematic commit in the fop history instead?
I have tried to build the pdf against the trunk version of fop and it passes (revision 1211788). Another user is confirming this on the fop users mailing list. -- Vincent Hobeïka
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
