On 12/24/2011 06:23 PM, Patrice Duroux wrote:
Package: audacious
Version: 2.4.4-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
This is still an alpha1 version but no more libmowgli dependency (regarding
http://audacious-media-player.org/news/7-audacious-3-2-alpha1-released and a
compilation try), so may be a good experimental target!
Regards,
Patrice.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages audacious depends on:
ii audacious-plugins 2.4.4-1+b2
ii dbus 1.5.8-1
ii dbus-x11 1.5.8-1
ii gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.24.8-2
ii libaudclient2 2.4.4-1
ii libaudcore1 2.4.4-1
ii libc6 2.13-23
ii libdbus-1-3 1.5.8-1
ii libdbus-glib-1-2 0.98-1
ii libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 2.24.0-2
ii libglib2.0-0 2.30.2-4
ii libgtk2.0-0 2.24.8-2
ii libice6 2:1.0.7-2
ii libmcs1 0.7.2-2
ii libmowgli2 0.7.1-1
ii libsm6 2:1.2.0-2
Versions of packages audacious recommends:
ii unzip 6.0-5
audacious suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
Hi Patrice.
I agree, I think a 3.2-alpha1 could land on experimental as a
preparation for the 3.2 stable version to be (we hope) included in
Debian Testing before the freeze in July 2012.
Thanks.
--
Cyril "Davromaniak" Lavier
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
