On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 21:19:15 +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 06:07:21PM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012, Roger Leigh wrote: > > > One problem mentioned in a few bugreports is the handling of > > > updates to /etc/default/rcS. Because it's not a conffile, we > > > don't provide updates to it. While there are good reasons for > > > this approach, I was thinking of ways of improving the situation. > > > > > > While we don't want to lose any user customisation of this file, > > > would it make sense to update the file to the latest version if > > > it hasn't been modified? We can do this quite simply: take the > > > > Better check ucf, no reason to reinvent the wheel... > > I've attached a patch to do this. I haven't used ucf before, and > didn't realise it was equivalent. Is this OK with you? > initscripts is priority required, ucf is standard. I don't think this wishlist bug is a good reason to make the Essential set larger.
Cheers, Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature