Your message dated Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:55:10 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Re: Bug#503776: freeguide: java bytecode / java runtime 
version mismatch
has caused the Debian Bug report #503776,
regarding freeguide: java bytecode / java runtime version mismatch
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)


-- 
503776: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=503776
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: freeguide
Version: 0.10.9-1
Severity: serious
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: jbc-mismatch

This package builds with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6, which is not the
default jvm in testing/unstable. The openjdk-6 and cacao-oj6 javac
creates java bytecode for version 50, which cannot be used by older
jvms. Binary packages explicitely built with openjdk-6 or cacao-oj6
must not depend on java-runtime{,1,2,5}{,-headless}, but only on
java-runtime6{,-headless} or any of the non-virtual packages providing
a java6 runtime.

It is preferred to build the bytecode so that it runs on older jvms.
This is done passing '-source 1.[45]' to javac (or for cdbs ant tasks
setting ANT_OPTS to -Dant.build.javac.source=1.[45].

You usually can check for the java byte code with file(1), currently
broken in testing/unstable, or use javap -verbose (a script checking
the command line args (check-class-version) can be found at
http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/. Both .class and .jar files found
in the binary packages need to be checked.

Note: this report may be a false positive, if all bytecode files have
version 49 or less.



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
 On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 09:26 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Note: this report may be a false positive, if all bytecode files have
> version 49 or less.
$ ~/check-class-version /usr/share/freeguide/lib/*
grabber-cosmostv.jar 48
grabber-kulichki.jar 48
grabber-newsvm.jar 48
grabber-ntvplus.jar 48
grabber-rbc.jar 48
grabber-vsetv.jar 48
grabber-xmltv.jar 48
importexport-html.jar 48
importexport-jtv.jar 48
importexport-mobile.jar 48
importexport-palmatv.jar 48
importexport-xmltv.jar 48
program-freeguide.jar 48
reminder-alarm.jar 48
retroweaver-rt-1.2.5.jar 46
storage-serfiles.jar 48
tagsoup-1.0.1.jar 46
ui-horizontal.jar 48
ui-vertical.jar 48



--- End Message ---

Reply via email to