Your message dated Sun, 7 Mar 2010 18:04:09 +0100
with message-id <20100307170409.ga25...@finlandia.home.infodrom.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#552871: [NMU] mailto: FTBFS: util.c:96: error:
conflicting types for 'getline'
has caused the Debian Bug report #552871,
regarding mailto: FTBFS: util.c:96: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
552871: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=552871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: mailto
Version: 1.3.2-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20091028 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build on
amd64.
In eglibc <= 2.9, getline was only defined if _GNU_SOURCE was defined.
In eglibc 2.10, getline is always defined (since it became a standard in
POSIX2008). The problem is that your package already has a function
named getline(), which now conflicts with glibc's. You need to rename
your function to something else.
Ubuntu already fixed many occurences of your problem, so it is possible
that an Ubuntu patch is available for your package. Look at the PTS to
find out.
Relevant part:
> cc -O2 -Wall -c -o util.o util.c
> util.c:96: error: conflicting types for 'getline'
> /usr/include/stdio.h:651: error: previous declaration of 'getline' was here
> make[1]: *** [util.o] Error 1
The full build log is available from:
http://people.debian.org/~lucas/logs/2009/10/28/mailto_1.3.2-2_lsid64.buildlog
A list of current common problems and possible solutions is available at
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS . You're welcome to contribute!
About the archive rebuild: The rebuild was done on about 50 AMD64 nodes
of the Grid'5000 platform, using a clean chroot. Internet was not
accessible from the build systems.
--
| Lucas Nussbaum
| lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ |
| jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F |
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Jari Aalto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to prepare an NMU for this RC bug as I've been checking other
> similar bugs in the archive. Please let me know if this bug is being
> worked on, or if it's okay to submit NMU.
Thanks Jari, I must have missed your mail and only found the corresponding
bug on mailto.
This bug is fixed in version 1.3.2-3:
mailto (1.3.2-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Disable included version of getline() since it is unused and produce
an FTBFS (closes: Bug#551449)
* Don't use '0' flag used with '%p' gnu_printf format [mailto.c]
-- Joey Schulze <j...@infodrom.org> Sat, 16 Jan 2010 20:27:45 +0100
Regards,
Joey
--
Those who don't understand Unix are condemned to reinvent it, poorly.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
--- End Message ---
