Hi, On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 04:14:04PM +0700, Daiki Ueno wrote: > Evgeni Golov <evg...@debian.org> writes: > > *However* I'd not use dpatch at all here. > > Maintainer already has direct changes to files in his .diff.gz > > (lib/diakonos.rb and lib/diakonos/help.rb) and I think forcing him to > > some patch system he is not (yet) using is the wrong way *here* (don't > > understand me wrong, I'm all for patch systems [even if I prefer quilt > > over dpatch] but here we are not the maintainer and should adapt his > > workflow). > > Yes, I used dpatch just to make it clear that the shebang change is > Debian specific. I have no strong opinion on whether/which patch > systems are used here.
Yes, but the maintainer already has direct changes in his diff.gz, without a patch system. So I'd continue his workflow here and do it without a proper patch system. > > PS: if you want, i can upload the patch/NMU after you fixed the point(s) > > above :) > > Thanks, but not really for now. I also think that it would be > definitely better for the bug to be fixed by the maintainer :-) It is better, for sure, but well, the bug is RC (diakonos is completely unuseable atm) and already 6 days old. I think I will upload a NMU to DELAYED/7 or so later today. Regards Evgeni -- Bruce Schneier can read and understand Perl programs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
