Use the version in unstable to build against.
A header file and not just a symbol were removed; i'm not sure whats
involved
in making gdal build against it.
To my understanding, no other package directly uses libdap, but rather
links it
via gdal, but they will need to be rebuilt once gdal is fixed. It would
be good if
--as-needed was used to remove this false dependency.
regards
Alastair
On 2011-08-30 10:56, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:39:40AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
So what? Some reverse build-deps like gdal are still waiting in the dark
for a rebuild ...
Last I checked the API change in new libdap makes gdal 1.7 unbuildable
anyway, so that will need a source upload.
Thanks, let me check about that. Alastair, should I consider the current libdap
version in unstable or the experimental one to prepare a fix?
--
Alastair McKinstry ,<alast...@sceal.ie> ,<mckins...@debian.org>
http://blog.sceal.ie
Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world
is either a madman or an economist - Kenneth Boulter, Economist.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
