Jeff Breidenbach wrote:

> In retrospect, it was possibly a mistake for upstream to bump
> the soname up to 3 in one of the releases. It is also very
> hard for me to imagine any scenario where having multiple
> versions of Leptonica installed at the same time makes sense.

Here's a patch on top of the one sent before to take this feedback
into account.

Sane?

The shared library policy is your friend.  Trust the shared library
policy. :)

Jonathan

 debian/changelog |    8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 51648488..6382ff33 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
 leptonlib (1.69-3.1) local; urgency=low
 
   * Rename the libleptonica package to liblept3. (closes: #664176)
-    This way, liblept3 and old versions of libleptonica can be
-    installed at the same time to keep binaries linked against
-    liblept.so.1 working.
+    Otherwise, libleptonica from wheezy can satisfy dependencies by
+    packages in squeeze, producing "liblept.so.1: cannot open
+    shared object file" errors.
   * debian/control: liblept3 breaks and replaces libleptonica
     (>= 1.69~) to take over /usr/lib/liblept.so.3.
 
- -- Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>  Sat, 07 Jul 2012 01:34:26 -0500
+ -- Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com>  Sun, 08 Jul 2012 01:39:14 -0500
 
 leptonlib (1.69-3) unstable; urgency=low
 
-- 
1.7.10.4




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-rc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to