Scribit Thomas Lange dies 25/11/2005 hora 15:34: > My future plans are to move it to /srv, but the question is, if it's > really a FHS violation.
nfsroot can be updated, regenerated, modified to fit the user's needs, and so on. I don't see how it can really be seen read-only. So it can't be in /usr. > I'm also wondering, why there are currently no Debian packages using > /srv. I hesitate to be the first package using /srv. Heck, don't hesitate! Or maybe do (cf. after)... :-/ Maybe an answer is people do some things only were forced to do so. /srv is a great innovation of the FHS, I think, but many maintainers I asked to use it answer it was not mandatory. Indeed, the 3.6.2 policy only mandates FHS 2.1, but /srv was added in 2.3. The problem is, strictly speaking, using /srv would not be policy compliant, I think, because there is no mention of /srv in the currently included FHS. Maybe you should just usr /var/lib/fai and just be prepared to switch to /srv/fai when possible. Doubtfully, Nowhere man -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
