Hi, Maximiliano!

Thnaks for your comment.

2017-02-11 19:16 GMT+09:00 Maximiliano Curia <m...@gnuservers.com.ar>:
> ¡Hola Nobuhiro!
>
> El 2017-02-11 a las 15:48 +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu escribió:
>>
>> Control: tags 811980 + patch
>
>
>>> This package fails to build with GCC 6.  GCC 6 has not been released yet,
>>> but it's expected that GCC 6 will become the default compiler for stretch.
>
>
>>> Note that only the first error is reported; there might be more.  You can
>>> find a snapshot of GCC 6 in experimental.  To build with GCC 6, you can set
>>> CC=gcc-6 CXX=g++-6 explicitly.
>
>
>>> You may be able to find out more about this issue at
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html
>
>
>> I create a patch which update symboles file. Could you check this patch?
>
>
> I've considered requesting the removal of libusbtc08 as I'm no longer using
> it, it seems that there aren't any users for it, and upstream stopped
> distributing their source code for the newer versions
> (https://www.picotech.com/downloads/linux).
>
> If you want to take care of libusbtc08 as is and/or work with upstream
> please consider taking over this package.
>
> In any case, I'm listed in the https://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu, feel
> free to upload the fix without asking for permission.
>
> Happy hacking,

I see.
I will NMU.

>
>> --- libusbtc08-1.7.2/debian/libusbtc08-1.symbols      2015-08-27
>> 05:37:20.000000000 +0900
>> +++ libusbtc08-1.7.2/debian/libusbtc08-1.symbols      2017-02-11
>> 15:30:30.000000000 +0900
>> @@ -67,9 +67,6 @@
>>  _ZN13PicoUsbDevice4InitEv@Base 1.7.2
>>  _ZN13PicoUsbDevice5CountEt@Base 1.7.2
>>  _ZN13PicoUsbDevice9EnumerateEPPS_jt@Base 1.7.2
>> - (optional=gccinternal)_ZN13PicoUsbDeviceD0Ev@Base 1.7.2
>> - (optional=gccinternal)_ZN13PicoUsbDeviceD1Ev@Base 1.7.2
>> - (optional=gccinternal)_ZN13PicoUsbDeviceD2Ev@Base 1.7.2
>
> No need to drop optional fields (these are the default destructors, and
> might show up again in a future version of gcc).
>

Indeed.

> ...
>
>> - (optional=gccinternal)_ZTV13PicoUsbDevice@Base 1.7.2
>
> Mmh, this one should probably stay, as the class is still present and
> contains virtual methods
>
> Most likely you would need a second upload after processing all the buildds
> logs, it might make sense to use the pkg-kde-tools symbolshelper for this.
>

OK, I will check with pkg-kde-tools symbolshelper too.

> Happy hacking,

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
   iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
   GPG ID: 40AD1FA6

Reply via email to