On 25/02/2020 02:37, Steven Robbins wrote:
Eric,
Thank you for the bug report. Per your question: I do indeed test before
uploading -- I've been using Digikam 7 since I uploaded last week.
Well if there had been an explicit dependency against libhdf5-103,
installing would not have even worked because it would have attented to
update libhdf5-103 from experimental at the same time it was pulling
digikam...
I have done a recursice dependency listing and it is indeed listed but I
would have assumed that anything listed in ldd /usr/bin/digikam would be
listed...
Can you try using deps from unstable and let us know how it goes?
As other have pointed out, it works but remains
1) that the dependency generation is questionnable and probably not
well controlled because in 5.9 I have faced the same bug, 6.4 doesn't
even depend on libhdf*, 7.0.0 has no explicit depedncies,
2) If I do and experimental update it start failing again,
3) as soon as libhdf-103 hits unstable, the problem will reappear,
-- eric
