Your message dated Wed, 18 Nov 2020 09:18:53 +0000
with message-id <e1kfjc5-0002gj...@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#973871: fixed in gnustep-icons 1.0-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #973871,
regarding gnustep-icons: invalid maintainer address
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
973871: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnustep-icons
Version: 1.0-8
Severity: serious
X-Debbugs-Cc: Gürkan Myczko <gur...@phys.ethz.ch>, ba...@debian.org

The maintainer address is invalid, see bounce message below.

Three other packages also have the same invalid address: chess.app,
fontmanager.app and price.app.

Ansgar

On Wed, 2020-11-04 at 18:16 +0000, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> 
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> 
>   pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.debian.org
>     host bendel.debian.org [2001:41b8:202:deb:216:36ff:fe40:4002]
>     SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT 
> TO:<pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.debian.org>:
>     550 5.1.1 <pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.debian.org>:
>     Recipient address rejected: User unknown in virtual alias table

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: gnustep-icons
Source-Version: 1.0-9
Done: =?utf-8?q?G=C3=BCrkan_Myczko?= <gur...@phys.ethz.ch>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gnustep-icons, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 973...@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Gürkan Myczko <gur...@phys.ethz.ch> (supplier of updated gnustep-icons package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2020 07:18:52 +0100
Source: gnustep-icons
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0-9
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNUstep maintainers 
<pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Gürkan Myczko <gur...@phys.ethz.ch>
Closes: 973871
Changes:
 gnustep-icons (1.0-9) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * Fix Maintainer address. (Closes: #973871).
Checksums-Sha1:
 f5ae36b40e5686475f9cbf50afda2a1ac97cc6af 1977 gnustep-icons_1.0-9.dsc
 380d941b46ece102089d91cd9051635bd67c6599 2416 gnustep-icons_1.0-9.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
 02a629824bcc98ff239cf901e3cc6048f5887db1634636dfbae7012536f0469d 1977 
gnustep-icons_1.0-9.dsc
 e98c02994163edae80df48409a9e91e9d0bdcc23d3c2a18a5b81083d4917b684 2416 
gnustep-icons_1.0-9.debian.tar.xz
Files:
 a8e16a6018371230cf71a0e813acf46e 1977 gnustep optional gnustep-icons_1.0-9.dsc
 c39c7fa01ce1dda6e615d9ac7e0e01a2 2416 gnustep optional 
gnustep-icons_1.0-9.debian.tar.xz

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=WEJB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to