Le lun. 21 déc. 2020 à 16:06, Sven Mueller <sven.muelle...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Well, turns out that apparently nobody else bothers with a .symbols file for > Python extensions. I looked at the packages for samba, numpy, mypy and > python-stdlib-extensions. And if the Python maintainers themselves don't do > it, you probably shouldn't. > > I attached a diff to remove the relevant file and the setup for it. I also > added some verbosity to the stuff debhelper does (I find it harder to debug > build issues without it). > I verified that except for this symbols file going away, nothing else > changed. (Most notable, the main libldb-dev package still looks the same.) - > Verified via diffoscope which only showed expected changes (timestamps, > mostly) > > I'll see if I can turn it into a pull request on Salsa, but my git-foo is > weaker than it probably should be, so feel free to just apply my patch > yourself. > If I create a pull request, should that include an update to debian/changelog?
Hello, just a quick note that I won't work on this for bullseye. If you can propose a MR in salsa and test that samba builds and works, I'll happily review it. Regards -- Mathieu Parent
